When a psychologist is unsure about a potential ethical violation, which of the following entities should they consult?

A psychologist who is uncertain about a potential ethical violation should consult with other psychologists who are knowledgeable about ethics because this option provides a framework for professional and peer support. Engaging with peers who have expertise in ethical matters allows for the sharing of practical experiences, interpretations of ethical guidelines, and collaborative problem-solving. This dialogue can help clarify the situation and promote adherence to ethical standards within the profession.

Consulting other psychologists fosters a community of practice that strengthens ethical decision-making. It creates an environment where psychologists can discuss complex cases or ethical dilemmas in a confidential and supportive setting, thereby enhancing their understanding and approach to resolving the issues at hand.

While state licensing boards and professional organizations also play important roles in addressing ethical concerns, they may not provide the immediate, specific peer advice and moral support that can be essential in navigating dilemmas. Family members or friends, although potentially supportive, lack the professional background and expertise necessary to offer valid guidance regarding ethical psychology practices. Therefore, peer consultation remains the most effective and pertinent option in this context.