What should psychologists clarify regarding informed consent when services are court-ordered?

When services are court-ordered, psychologists must clarify the anticipated services and the limits of confidentiality because these aspects are crucial in understanding the nature of the evaluation or treatment being provided. Court-ordered services often come with specific legal and procedural implications that may differ from voluntary services.

In this context, clarifying the anticipated services helps the individual understand what they can expect during the treatment or evaluation process. Additionally, outlining the limits of confidentiality is vital, as individuals involved in court-ordered services may be unaware that certain information could be disclosed to the court or other agencies. This understanding is essential to ensure that the individual comprehends their situation and what the treatment entails, thus promoting informed consent.

Addressing other factors such as the rights to refuse treatment or the supervision by a judge is important but is not as central as clearly outlining the services and confidentiality limits. By focusing on these core issues, psychologists help individuals navigate the complexities of court-ordered interventions effectively.