What must be proven for a board member to be removed for neglect of duty?

To remove a board member for neglect of duty, it is necessary to demonstrate a failure to fulfill the responsibilities associated with their position. This implies that the board member has not adequately met the obligations and duties defined either by the organization's bylaws or by the expectations of their role on the board.

Neglect of duty can encompass a range of behaviors, including but not limited to, not attending meetings, not engaging in discussions, or failing to execute decisions that are crucial to the well-being and governance of the organization. The focus here is on the board member's overall performance and accountability in their role, rather than circumstances that may not reflect their capability to fulfill responsibilities.

While inability to attend meetings or personal conflicts may impact a board member's effectiveness, they are not sufficient grounds for removal unless they directly contribute to a consistent neglect of duties. Financial mismanagement, while serious, typically pertains to specific actions or decisions rather than a broader failure to perform one's role effectively. Thus, the correct answer emphasizes the necessity of demonstrating a fundamental lack of engagement and fulfillment of responsibilities to justify removal.