What can the Board NOT require from an allegedly impaired psychologist?

The correct answer highlights what the Board cannot mandate from an allegedly impaired psychologist. Specifically, the Board does not require psychologists to document each instance of impairment while with a client. This captures an understanding of the Board's role in overseeing the conduct of psychologists and ensuring they comply with the ethical and legal standards without imposing unnecessary burdens that could hinder their ability to practice effectively.

Requiring documentation of each instance of impairment could be problematic and might not be a feasible or appropriate demand in all cases. Instead, the Board focuses on various assessments of the psychologist's fitness to continue in their role, such as examinations or referrals to support programs, while ensuring the privacy and confidentiality of patient records are respected.

The other options represent reasonable requirements that the Board can impose to evaluate a psychologist's fitness for practice. Submitting to mental and physical examinations provides a clear assessment of the psychologist's capabilities. Producing psychological records related to the illness helps the Board understand the nature of the impairment and its impact on practice. Referring to a Colleague Assistance Program demonstrates a proactive step in seeking help and support for the psychologist, which aligns with professional standards for addressing impairment in the field.